The
Modern Technique of the Pistol
Greg Boyce Morrison
Jeff Cooper,
Editorial Advisor
reviewed by John M. Buol
Jr.
http://SensibleShooter.com/
Jack
Weaver was interviewed by American Handgunner magazine (May/June
2008) about how he created the Weaver Stance and the history of
practical shooting. These developments led to what is known as the
The Modern Technique of the Pistol. Greg Morrison, under advisement
from Jeff Cooper, wrote a book of the same name that stands as the
definitive text of the subject.
Overview
This 1991
effort codifies the then-current doctrine of defensive pistol as
taught by the American Pistol Institute (API), now under different
management and called Gunsite Ranch.
The forward begins with
"The Evolution of the Modern Technique", as described by
co-creator and chief proponent, Jeff Cooper. Dissatisfied with
handgun technique of of the time, Cooper attempted to improve handgun
technique by helping put forth an "Advanced Combat Pistol
Course" just after World War II.
Upon separation from
service, and free from bureaucratic restriction, he formed several
shooting clubs and ran a number of different competitive venues with
the help of several like-minded marksmen, mostly from the civilian
sector. Over the course of time, consistent winners and their
technique began to surface in these varying, freestyle matches. These
events would lead to the creation of the International Practical
Shooting Confederation and lay the foundation for a number of
practical shooting disciplines. The best, most consistent techniques
of the day were codified into the "Modern Technique of the
Pistol." and Cooper founded API to teach it.
The Modern
Technique consists of three components, or the "Combat
Triad":
1.Marksmanship
2.Gun Handling
3.Mind-Set
The
book begins with Mind-Set, which includes the "thinking side"
of the triad, ranging from safety procedures, combat mind-set, and
basic, individual tactics. A section on training psychology is
added.
Gunhandling is next, which includes loading and
unloading, magazine exchanges/ammunition management, the presentation
(drawing), Guard (ready) position, and malfunction
clearances.
Marksmanship, is comprised of Accuracy (the
ability to hit), Power (wound potential, to stop the threat), and
Quickness (the ability to hit before it is too late.) In addition to
raw fundamentals, this includes the firing of pairs and firing from
different positions, such as kneeling, prone, or with a
flashlight.
The basic guidelines defines five elements:
1)The
Weaver Stance
2)The Flash Sight picture
3)The Compressed
Surprise-break
4)The Presentation
5)The Heavy-duty Self-loading
pistol.
The Modern Technique was a major improvement in
practical/defensive handgunning and cemented Cooper's deserved
reputation as a shooting and firearms innovator.
It has been
pointed out that Cooper and company didn't invent every element of
the Modern Technique. For example, there was at least one book
demonstrating a two handed, eye-level handgun stance remarkably
similar to the Weaver published when Cooper would have been in his
pre-teens, decades before the Modern Technique was prototyped.
Old-time range masters in the law enforcement community have noted
that their individual departments began using Modern Technique-like
training before Cooper made a name for it and founded his
school.
However, where a handful of individuals may have made
a few realizations about improved defensive handgunning, Cooper and
company actually did it. He didn't merely speculate and talk to a few
colleagues, but held open events to develop, test and prove ideas,
found a voice to broadcast what he learned via the gun publishing
industry, and then formed a school to teach it. This caused a total
shift in philosophy for defensive handgunning at all levels of law
enforcement, military and civilian. Most instructors in the field are
borrowing his ideas and following the example, if not copying
outright.
Bottom line, this book provides a solid doctrine for
the effective use of a defensive handgun. Anyone who studies and
practices what is in this book, or better yet, attends a training
event, will become a deadly pistolero.
What is Bad about The
Modern Technique of the Pistol
Morrison points out that "...
the Modern Technique has yet to reach its zenith." If this book
is an indicator, that may be due in part to API's seeming inability
to grow beyond the last developments of the late 1970's. The
techniques are presented as one-way-only in an antiseptically clean,
almost rigid, doctrine. In other words, the book seems a bit forced
and API is ignoring post-Modern Technique developments created in
precisely the same crucible (practical pistol competition) from
whence it was forged.
Cooper started as a freestyle innovator,
bucking tradition and a fixed, dated doctrine in order to find a
better way. Upon making important improvements, he and his disciples
now preach a fixed, slightly dated doctrine, ignoring any freestyle
innovators who buck their tradition.
For example, self-styled
"martial artists" whine about the "gamey"
elements and “rooney” guns sometimes found in current
competition and aren't willing to look for potential
improvements.
On the technique side, both marksmanship and
tactical thought has progressed.
Since the early 1980's,
virtually every successful practical pistol contender has used some
Isosceles stance variant, finding it provides a better, and faster
shooting platform. According to Modern Technique purists, that is
impossible and they attribute it to light loads and gamey guns. Never
mind the fact that .38 Super pistols are required to shoot the same
power factor as .45 ACP (until recently, a hardball-like 175+ Power
Factor) and generate ballistic performance on par with full .357
Magnum loads.
Compensators do nothing to prevent recoil but
only serve to hold the muzzle down and keep the gun “flat”
to increase shooter performance. And if one still can't see past that
gear, then look at the Limited, Production, and IDPA shooting
divisions, the places where most practical pistol shooters compete.
You'll find that even the winners often shoot “Cooper approved”
cartridges (.45 ACP, 10mm) and rarely shoot from Weaver. Modern
Technique purists stick to their tradition while ignoring the fact
that many of these shooters are accomplishing superior results.
Massad Ayoob published his “heretical” list of
Modern Technique improvements for law enforcement in his 1983 book,
“Stressfire”, demonstrating potential problems and
offering potential solutions. API's book was published seven years
later, but none of that is here. The book also ignores other
potentially useful close range techniques, such as Applegate-style,
eye-level pointing, target focus, arms-length tuck/retention position
shooting, etc.
On the equipment side, API propose very basic
accompanying gear and lightly tuned 1911s. I appreciate that very
much. However, one should be able to see and use potentially new gear
if it offers an improvement. Note that in the 1950s and '60s, tuned
1911 .45 pistols were "rooney" guns, as few in law
enforcement carried them, and the military used only rack-grade,
unmodified 1920's era pistols. But today, Modern Technique purists
ridicule new technology, such as optics, even though they are finding
their way in law enforcement and military circles, and
miniaturization may make them practical for carry pistols.
What
is Good about The Modern Technique of the Pistol
That all
said, the method of defensive handgunnery as presented in this book
can be quite effective. In some respects, the "Modern Technique"
may be a bit out of date, at least not completely state of the art,
but that isn't a huge problem. Technique is merely a means to an end.
The important thing is to learn a usable doctrine and then
actually STUDY and PRACTICE it. The Modern Technique is, at worst,
usable doctrine.
The best part of this book is in the
Appendix, "Practice Suggestions for the API Graduate" and
"Target Reading." Most books pretending to offer
information on marksmanship fail utterly because they don't provide
any standard of performance. How can I know if I'm shooting well if I
don't have a standard for comparison? Here is the standard suggested
from API:
Practice Suggestions for the API Graduate
Target:
API "Option" (similar to the old IPSC Option, but with a
camouflaged coloring). A basic silhouette, 18x30 inches, with six
inch shoulder cuts for the head, a 10-inch X ring and 14-inch outer
ring, a four inch circle inside the six inch square head.
Use
your carry gun and holster.
Part 1: Head shots.
3 yards.
Single head shot, starting holstered, in 1.5 seconds.
7 yards.
Single head shot, starting holstered, in 2.0 seconds.
Part 2:
Mozambique drill (simulating a failure to stop)
3 yards: Fire a
pair to the chest (X ring) in 1.5 seconds. Come down to Guard
position, eyes on target. At a second fire command make a single head
shot in 1.0 seconds. Repeat the entire drill.
7 yards: Repeat the
3 yard drill, allowing 2.0 seconds for the pair to the chest and 1.5
seconds for the head shot.
Part 3: Facing a target at 10
yards, fire a pair of hits to the chest (X-ring), starting holstered,
in less than 2.0 seconds. Repeat if desired.
Part 4: Face to
the right (3 o'clock) of downrange, and place yourself 10 yards from
the target. Begin holstered. Turn, draw, and place two hits to the
chest in 2.0 seconds. Repeat from the left (9 o'clock) and from a
position where you have your back to the target (6 o'clock).
Part
5: Facing a target at 10 yards, draw and place two hits to the chest,
reload, and hit twice more in 5.0 seconds.
Part 6: Quick
assumption of kneeling. Facing a target at 15 yards,
assume
the braced kneeling position, and place two hits to the chest (X
ring) on the target in 3.5 seconds. Push this drill back to 25 yards
when you can.
Part 7: Quick assumption of roll over prone.
Facing a target at 25 yards, assume the roll over prone position and
place two hits on the target in 7.0 seconds. Push this back to 50
yards when you can. Seven seconds is still enough time, or you may
wish to shorten the 25 yard time to about 5 seconds.
API's
recommendation is learn to balance speed, and to not shoot faster
than you can maintain all hits on the target with at least 80% X ring
hits. Shooting "clean" (100% X ring hits) means you should
shoot faster.
This hardly represents the pinnacle of practical
pistol performance, however, any shooter who could clean this course
on demand is fairly competent and more skillful than most law
enforcement, military and civilian handgun owners and
carriers.
Target reading
Even a service, rack-grade pistol
will shoot a golf ball sized group at typical combat distances, slow
fire. Shooting faster will see that group open up, but it should be
no bigger than a large grapefruit or perhaps your wide-open hand, and
remain centered on the target, in the X-ring.
Groups that get
abnormally large indicated that the shooter is focusing on the
target, not the front sight.
12 o-clock groups indicate
"heeling", pushing away with the heel of the hand at
firing, or raising the front sight too high when shooting at
distance. Combat zero should be 2.5 inches high at 25 yards
9
o'clock indicate the firing wrist or grip is offset to the right, or
trigger is pressed wrong, or support arm is moved out and upward.
3
o'clock, too much gripping pressure and twisting to the right, often
in DA auto pistols.
6 o clock, mash instead of surprise break,
or increasing firing hand pressure as the trigger is pressed. Keep
separate from PIP (post ignition push) IF the hits are still good,
timing will bring the gun down in recoil.
10-11 o clock
indicates a lack of followthrough, such as starting to reload too
soon.
"Baja California", hurry and get it over with,
down at 7-8 o'clock, indicates some combination of flinch and trigger
mash.
Once again, learn a usable doctrine, study it and
PRACTICE. Find a class, or a club running events that suit you and
attend. You won't learn anything until you actually go out and do
it.
Jack Weaver
Interviewed:
http://www.americanhandgunner.com/webblastWVR.html
Weaver
Stance history:
http://weaverstance.com/history.htm
Subscribe to Firearm User Network